Follow the Coalition at CBD COP and COP31

Follow the Coalition at CBD COP and COP31
Read More

Coalition of Finance Minister events, reports, tools, and highlights 

The Coalition is dedicated to providing insightful news updates on global efforts and progress in country domestic climate action we support

 

The first Action Areas of the updated Flagship Guide are now open for consultation.

Coalition members and other interested stakeholders are invited to review the drafts and share their feedback, country experience, and implementation lessons to help make the final Guide as practical and useful as possible for Ministries of Finance. 

Contribute through the consultation form

Explore the consultation draft on the interactive website and share your feedback

Read the two-page summary for policymakers.

Consultation until 30 November 2026 

 

 

The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) and the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action (CFMCA) have launched a new joint dialogue platform to deepen knowledge sharing between central banks and finance ministries on the macroeconomic dimensions of climate change and the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Check the previous and upcoming joint events here.

 

The Coalition’s program in Bangkok brings together ministerial leadership, regional and technical dialogue, and practical exchanges on climate and economic policy and reflects its growing focus on implementation, peer exchange and strengthening the role of Finance Ministries in climate action.
 
Read our main outcomes:

And follow us on LinkedIn for daily updates.

 

About the Coalition

Finance Ministers hold the keys to accelerating climate action. They are most clearly aware of the risks posed by climate change and recognize how taking action could unlock trillions in investments and create millions of jobs by 2030.

The Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action brings together fiscal and economic policymakers from 100 countries to lead the global climate response and secure a just transition towards low-carbon, resilient development.

104 Member Countries

Member Countries

 

From Dialogue to Delivery: Coalition Engagements at the 2026 Annual Meetings

October 26, 2026

The Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action brought together more than 300 participants in person and online, representing 70 countries and more than 40 organizations during the 2026 World Bank Group–IMF Annual Meetings in Bangkok for a week of discussions focused on a central question: how can Finance Ministries navigate immediate economic and fiscal pressures while continuing to invest in resilient, competitive and sustainable economies?

The Coalition connected discussions on macroeconomic and fiscal resilience with practical implementation, private capital mobilization, nature, regional cooperation and country-level experience. The program reflected the Coalition’s growing focus on moving from policy ambition to implementation and identifying practical solutions that Finance Ministries can adapt to their own national circumstances. The Coalition’s post-AM26 review highlighted particularly substantive country interventions, with participants sharing implementation steps, lessons learned and specific areas where further Coalition support could add value. 

Connecting fiscal resilience, investment and implementation

The week opened with discussions on one of the most persistent challenges facing Finance Ministries: how to finance resilience and sustainable growth when fiscal space is constrained. Through the Xingu Finance Talks, participants explored approaches to expanding fiscal space for climate investment and reducing the cost of capital, including through guarantees and risk-sharing mechanisms.am26

The Asia-Pacific Regional Dialogue on Climate Fiscal Resilience and Climate Finance, organized with the Asian Development Bank, brought another dimension to the implementation challenge. Representatives from Finance Ministries across the region emphasized that the challenge is increasingly not a lack of climate plans, but translating priorities into costed, finance-ready investments and embedding climate considerations into routine fiscal, budget and public investment decisions.

Discussions underscored how climate shocks can create a “double fiscal squeeze”, increasing emergency expenditure while simultaneously reducing government revenues. Participants also highlighted persistent barriers to adaptation finance, particularly for SIDS and LDCs, and the need to strengthen project preparation, investment pipelines, climate-responsive public financial management and institutional capacity within Finance Ministries.

Other engagements broadened the conversation. From Budgets to Biodiversity examined experiences from Brazil, Costa Rica, Indonesia, and Nigeria, and how nature considerations are being integrated into budgeting, public finance, and economic decision-making. At a workshop co-organized with UNEP FI and OECD, participants explored practical examples of insurance, guarantees, local-currency financing and risk-sharing structures that can help mobilize private investment for clean energy and adaptation. 

 

Finance Ministers at the center of the discussion

At the heart of the week was the the discussion centered on a difficult set of choices facing Ministries of Finance: how to respond to immediate pressures from energy price shocks, constrained fiscal space and elevated financing costs while continuing to invest in longer-term resilience, energy security and the transition. Participants emphasized that support to households and businesses during shocks needs to be carefully targeted and time-bound, while preserving fiscal sustainability and incentives for longer-term adjustment.

The discussion also highlighted the close links between energy security, competitiveness and macroeconomic resilience. Energy diversification, efficiency, electrification, and renewable energy were considered not only through the lens of climate objectives but also as ways to reduce economies’ exposure to volatile energy markets. With public budgets unable to meet investment needs alone, participants also stressed the importance of predictable policy and regulatory frameworks, credible investment pipelines, guarantees, blended finance and risk-sharing mechanisms to help mobilize private capital. Better modelling, data and scenario analysis were highlighted as important tools for Ministries of Finance navigating increasingly complex policy trade-offs. Check the Minister's Quotes here.

The Ministerial also anchored two major Coalition outputs: the fourth Climate Action Statement and the launch of the consultation process for the updated Coalition Flagship Guide. The Climate Action Statement brings together emerging priorities, practical lessons and approaches from Coalition members, while the Guide consultation is designed to draw on country experience and member feedback to develop a practical resource for Ministries of Finance. The conversation on implementation continued through the Post-Ministerial Deputies’ Dialogue, where members exchanged country experiences, challenges, and lessons, and provided input on the evolving technical content and recommendations of the updated Guide. 

A joint capacity-building workshop hosted by the Coalition, GFANZ and GCBC brought the implementation discussion to the institutional level, focusing on governance arrangements for country platforms. Using a fictional country case study, participants from Finance Ministries and the wider country-platform ecosystem explored how governments can design governance structures that bring together the institutions needed to identify priorities, address barriers to investment and mobilize capital. 

A key question was how the function and form of a country platform should evolve together. Discussions highlighted the importance of strong coordination across government and flexible governance arrangements that can adapt as platforms move from defining priorities toward implementation. Participants also emphasized the growing role of sector ministries, alongside the Ministry of Finance and other economic institutions, once investment priorities and barriers become clearer.

The week concluded with the Ministerial Breakfast: Doing More with Less: Scaling Private Investment for Transition and Adaptation, which explored the practical role of Finance Ministries in creating the policies, institutions and investment environments needed to attract greater private investment. Discussions considered how public and development finance can be used strategically to crowd in private investment, alongside regulatory and sustainable finance frameworks that support transition and adaptation priorities. 

Key takeaways from Bangkok

Implementation is increasingly the central challenge. Countries have developed strategies and plans, but the focus is shifting toward translating priorities into fiscal decisions, investable projects, financing strategies and institutional arrangements that can deliver results. 

Finance Ministries are navigating difficult short-term and long-term trade-offs. Energy price shocks, constrained fiscal space and financing pressures are forcing governments to balance immediate support for households and businesses with fiscal sustainability and longer-term investment in energy security, resilience and the transition. 

Climate risks are increasingly fiscal and macroeconomic risks. The Asia-Pacific Dialogue highlighted how climate shocks can simultaneously increase expenditure, reduce revenues and weaken fiscal and debt sustainability, reinforcing the importance of integrating climate risk into core macro-fiscal and public financial management processes. 

Mobilizing investment requires more than finding additional public finance. Discussions repeatedly returned to how Ministries of Finance can use scarce public and development resources strategically, while strengthening policy and regulatory frameworks, investment pipelines and risk-sharing mechanisms that can help mobilize private capital.

Institutions matter for implementation. The country-platform workshop showed how governance structures need to evolve with national priorities, bringing together central economic institutions and sector ministries as countries move from strategic coordination toward investment and delivery.

Peer learning is becoming more practical. Across the week, countries were not simply presenting ambitions. They were exchanging experience on concrete implementation challenges, from accessing adaptation finance and managing fiscal risks to creating investment pipelines and designing institutions capable of delivering them. 

What comes next

The conversations in Bangkok will continue through the Coalition’s work program.

The consultation on the first tranche of the updated Flagship Guide remains open until 30 November 2026, providing members and stakeholders with an opportunity to contribute experience, evidence and practical examples to its continued development. 

Contribute through the consultation form

Explore the consultation draft on the interactive website and share your feedback

Read the two-page summary for policymakers.

The Coalition is also carrying key themes from Bangkok into COP31, with planned engagements addressing cross-government action for economic transformation, economic analysis for green and resilient transitions, collaboration between Finance Ministries and central banks, and approaches to mobilizing finance for climate-resilient and green investment. 

Together, these next steps build on the direction established through the Coalition’s 2026–2028 Strategic Work Program: strengthening Finance Ministry leadership, supporting practical implementation, and using member experience and peer exchange to address the economic and fiscal dimensions of climate action. 

From Broad Subsidies to Targeted Support: How Finance Ministries Can Confront the New Energy Price Shock Without Derailing Public Finances and Distorting Markets

July 06, 2026

As a fresh surge in global fuel prices tests public finances already stretched thin, the central question for finance ministries is how they can avoid repeating the costly, regressive interventions of the last crisis as they design measures to shield households and firms. A recent country roundtable convened by the Coalition’s Thematic Priority 3 workstream and facilitated by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) brought together delegates from the Netherlands, Ecuador, Egypt, France, and Nigeria to compare responses in real time. The session was opened by Croatia, which co-chairs the Coalition with Uganda. The exchange revealed a striking convergence: across very different fiscal and social contexts, many finance ministries are turning to targeted, time-bound instruments instead of blanket price support.

"This energy price shock is a difficult test, but it is also an opportunity to demonstrate that fiscal pragmatism and climate ambition can and must be pursued together." Ana Zoric, Ministry of Finance, Croatia (CFMCA Co-Chair)

Why this matters now

International diesel prices rose roughly 78% between February and May 2026, driven by geopolitical disruption. Unlike the 2022 shock, this one is unfolding in a more constrained fiscal environment, leaving little room for the open-ended subsidies many governments reached for previously. For finance ministries, an energy price spike rapidly becomes a fiscal policy problem: how much to intervene, who should receive support, and how to withdraw it later. The roundtable's framing made the policy question explicit: how to contain cost pressures on the most vulnerable without dismantling the price signals that guide short-term consumption and long-term investment in decarbonization.

The case against broad subsidies is now widely shared

The analytical starting point, set out by IISD, is that broad-based fossil fuel subsidies, tax cuts, and price controls remain tempting because they are simple, fast, and visible, but are typically expensive, poorly targeted, hard to unwind, and corrosive to the price signals needed for clean investment. Country experience reinforced the point with hard numbers. Egypt noted that energy subsidies once consumed close to 2% of GDP, around a fifth of the national budget. Nigeria's fuel subsidy at its peak cost roughly 2.5% of GDP, more than the budget allocated for capital projects, while disproportionately benefiting wealthier households. The lesson the participating ministries drew is consistent: untargeted support is a fiscally unsustainable and regressive shock absorber.

"The temptation in a price spike is always to reach the broadest and fastest instrument, a universal subsidy. But targeted transfers, and really moving away from universal energy subsidies, are the key to achieving fiscal sustainability while abiding by our climate goals." Alaa Abdel-Rahman, Ministry of Finance, Egypt

Smoothing volatility while preserving price signals

A recurring theme was how to dampen extreme volatility without reintroducing permanent subsidies. Several ministries are institutionalizing rules-based pricing. Ecuador's fuel price band caps monthly price increases at 5% and limits decreases to 10%, insulating the domestic economy from international swings while allowing gradual alignment with market levels and protecting fiscal cost recovery. Egypt has operationalized an automatic pricing mechanism that adjusts fuel prices on a defined formula linked to oil prices and exchange rates, sequencing adjustments to manage the inflationary impact. France relies instead on targeted mechanisms that adjust automatically to inflation, indexed minimum wage, social benefits, and pensions to help households absorb the shock, complemented by one-off, lump-sum compensation rather than across-the-board price cuts.

Targeting depends on data and delivery systems

Experience suggests that a decisive constraint on targeted support is administrative. Where robust delivery infrastructure exists, targeted measures can be deployed quickly: Ecuador has integrated tax, fuel regulatory, transit, and social protection data to validate beneficiaries and disburse subsidies through public banking, while Egypt and Nigeria channeled subsidy savings into established cash transfer programs. Egypt's Takaful and Karama reaches 5.2 million families (around 20% of the population), and Nigeria is currently building a digital social register of some 20 million people with biometric verification to curb leakage. The Netherlands has similarly concentrated its temporary energy emergency fund on lower-income households with high energy bills and raised the tax-free commuting allowance for employees to offset higher travel costs, channeling relief through existing tax and benefit mechanisms rather than holding prices down for everyone. Regarding the gap, France said that where data simply does not exist in public systems, ministries may fall back on self-declaration and controls. For finance ministries, the message is that investment in identification and payment systems underpins credible, well-targeted relief. This investment should be made before a shock hits to ensure preparedness.

Linking relief to long-term resilience

Most striking for fiscal policymakers was how short-term relief is increasingly being designed to reduce future exposure rather than entrench dependence. The Netherlands paired targeted household and firm support with measures to cut reliance on foreign oil and gas and accelerate electrification, financing the package by redirecting existing budgets and removing poorly performing tax deductions, preserving fiscal space for further contingencies. Ecuador is recycling subsidy-reform savings into fleet scrapping, bus electrification pilots, and cleaner diesel standards. France is advancing a multi-year electrification plan, and Nigeria is funding electric mass transit, including a $1.3 billion Lagos electric rail line, alongside solar and gas-as-bridge investment. In each case, spending on crisis relief is being steered to shift market signals toward cleaner alternatives.

"When support is broad-based, it sends a faulty market signal and investment flows into fossil-fuel infrastructure. That has now shifted; there is a real appetite to invest in solar and electric vehicles."  Temitope Akinyemi, Head of the Green Growth Finance Coordination Unit, Nigeria

What comes next

The roundtable underscored that, despite divergent contexts, finance ministries are increasingly converging on a shared playbook: protect the vulnerable through direct transfers; where intervention in prices is judged necessary, target it at specific sectors and users rather than resorting to open-ended subsidies; and use measures that speed up the transition as part of a broader relief package, since reduced demand for fossil fuels lowers exposure to their volatile prices. Indeed, this year’s episode is a reminder to finance ministries that the most fiscally responsible response to an energy shock and the most climate-coherent one are increasingly aligned.

Finance Ministries Strengthen Climate Action Through Practical Economic Policies and Investment Frameworks

October 14, 2026

Finance Ministries are shifting from climate plans to delivery, according to a new climate action statement from a coalition of 103 Finance Ministries

Bangkok, 14 October 2026: Many Finance Ministries are building climate considerations into their core work, but they are doing so under growing strain from energy price shocks, geopolitical tensions and limited fiscal space, according to the 2026 Climate Action Statement published today by the 103-member Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action.

Higher fuel and electricity bills, persistent inflation and rising debt burdens are forcing ministries to decide how much to spend on shielding households and businesses now, without eroding the fiscal space and investment incentives needed for longer-term climate and resilience goals. Managing these trade-offs is placing greater technical and institutional demands on Finance Ministries.

16mm

Despite these constraints, many ministries are turning climate objectives into concrete measures: disaster-risk financing to prepare for climate shocks, sustainable finance frameworks to guide investment, carbon pricing, and tools to identify and manage climate-related risks to public finances.

"For many economies, the challenge is not a lack of priorities, but how to finance those priorities, improve implementation efficiency, break down silos, and mobilize private-sector financing," said Henry Musasizi, Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Uganda. "Building resilient economic systems requires working together towards a common goal and combining our efforts. That is precisely why we are all here together in this coalition."

Planning ahead for climate disasters: Finance Ministries are moving beyond reliance on post-disaster public spending and adopting disaster-risk financing strategies that set out in advance how risks are retained, shared and transferred. By combining contingency funds, contingent credit, insurance and reinsurance, catastrophe bonds and regional risk pools, these approaches help reduce fiscal vulnerability and ensure money reaches affected areas quickly when disasters strike.

Climate resilience is also being built into public financial management and budgeting, including through green budgeting, while insurance and risk transfer are increasingly linking resilience, financial stability and long-term development.

Blended finance is being used to mobilize private capital for adaptation, supported by stronger policy and regulatory frameworks. Some ministries are pairing this with reforms in public investment management, natural capital valuation and climate-related fiscal planning.

For a growing number of ministries, adaptation is becoming part of fiscal risk management rather than a separate environmental concern.

Responding to global rules: Cross-border carbon pricing instruments and evolving sustainability disclosure requirements are prompting ministries to examine their implications for competitiveness, trade, investment and access to international markets. Ministries are weighing both the risks, including leakage and spillover effects, and the opportunities for investment and innovation, while managing distributional and affordability impacts at home.

Many are strengthening climate-related disclosure frameworks and wider sustainable finance reforms, often aligned with international standards, while seeking to keep requirements practical, consistent and decision-useful. A recurring priority is understanding how global policy developments affect domestic economies, and building the institutions needed to attract private capital.

From policy instruments to integrated economic strategies: Climate instruments are increasingly designed to work together rather than as standalone policies. Green budgeting is shaping public investment choices. Sustainable taxonomies help direct capital to priority sectors, and disclosure standards improve the information available to investors. Carbon pricing is being linked to industrial transition and competitiveness policy, and adaptation finance is being built into fiscal risk management.

"The evolution of green budgeting reflects a broader shift in how governments make decisions. Climate considerations are increasingly becoming part of mainstream economic and fiscal policymaking, helping us better align public resources with long-term resilience and sustainable growth," said Tomislav Ćorić, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Croatia.

Challenges remain: Many countries continue to face constraints related to institutional capacity, access to finance, data availability, and coordination across government. Even so, there is a gradual shift towards implementation. There is no single pathway: different economic structures, income levels, climate vulnerabilities, and policy priorities require different approaches. What unites Coalition members is a commitment to strengthening economic resilience, mobilizing investment, and integrating climate considerations into the institutions and policies that shape long-term growth.

About the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action

The Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action supports Finance Ministries in embedding climate considerations into their core functions and mobilizing finance to close the green financing gap. By facilitating the exchange of experiences, lessons learned, and emerging practices across diverse national contexts, the Coalition helps Finance Ministries strengthen their institutional capabilities and move from policy ambition to implementation, supporting resilient and sustainable economic development.